Picture of PPP Design
PPP Design
Website Link

Authors  Contributors

PPP Design

The Market Place Fairness Act


The United States Legislature is revisiting the so called Market Place Fairness Act. There are proponents on both sides of this contentious issue. The  Market Place Fairness Act  would allow States (and other localities) to collect sales tax on Internet sales even when the business selling the product has no presence in the State the purchaser resides in. Currently, an online business only has to pay sales tax in States where it has either a physical presence like an office or staff like a sales representative (the rules are more complicated in many cases and are often based on the concept of a nexus between the business and a locale ). The Market Place Fairness Act would allow States and other locales to cross the sovereign borders of a  state and assess a sales tax on a sale that takes place in another State.

It is claimed that this act will even the playing field between brick and mortar businesses and online businesses like Amazon and others. The idea is that if a brick and mortar business has to pay sales tax and an online store does not it makes it difficult for a brick and mortar store to compete with the online store prices. On it's face this makes sense and of course we all want to be fair but there are several issues that are seldom if ever mentioned when this act is discussed.

If the goal is to be fair to both types of businesses then how will we address the fact that under this act an online seller may have to deal with as many as 9,600 different sales tax locales? The paper work, accounting fees and resources necessary to implement and remit taxes to multiple locales would be over whelming if not impossible. A bricks and mortar business (under current rules or if the act is implemented) would never have to deal with any where near this number of potential taxing authorities. This hardly seems like fairness is what the act is striving for.

I believe the elephant in the room is the fact that the act establishes the ability for States (and other locales) to require businesses to pay sales taxes to entities that do not offer the business any representation. I believe there was a revolution waged against taxation without representation and it was fought by the very same Country that now wants to impose an opportunity for this to take place again. It wasn't right 240 years ago and it isn't right now.

Another issue that plagues the Act is the possible privacy ramifications of States trying to monitor and track out of state sales. Would this require multiple State databases storing sales transactions from around the country? How will reporting be done? Will each locale have the ability to audit or demand access to business records? Who will be in charge of securing all of this information, the NSA?  I could go on and on but I think you can see my point.

These points barely scratch the surface of the issues that online businesses may face if this Act is passed.  I think it is highly unlikely that "Market Place Fairness" is the true reason this Act has been proposed given the problems it would inflict on online sellers. Regardless of the origin it appears that  Market Place Fairness Act supporters have ignored what the word fairness actually means. The word Fairness; "to be free from bias or injustice" simply doesn't suggest that possibly massive new compliance and regulatory hurdles would be "fair" for online sellers.

Like most modern political actions it is important to pull back the curtain and see what the real agenda is. The Act would rely on the power of the Federal Government to control interstate commerce. The interstate commerce clause is rife with constitutional questions which we won't get in to here. The larger question is what will happen when multiple States and Localities step in to tax a single sale, or when the process of complying with multiple jurisdictions sales tax  rules become over whelming for businesses? Will the businesses simply have to shut down or will Big Brother (The Federal Government) step in to save the day and administer a new national sales tax system?

RSS Feed Link

Tags:   Market Place Fairness Act | United States Legislature | contentious issue | sovereign borders | sales tax | online businesses  

Comments Policy Comment Policy
Comments Policy Close

Comments should be viewed as a conversation between two people. Please consider this an interactive discussion and act civilly.

All comments will be approved by a moderator. Although we would like to post every comment submitted immediately, site safety and our family friendly theme does not allow it.

Comments considered or deemed to be obscene, vulgar, cruel, pointless, embarrassing or harmful to this site, in poor taste, accusatory, flames, personal attacks, duplicates or spam will be edited or deleted.

This site is the final arbiter of whether or not a post falls in to one of the above categories. Whether or not a post or comment is displayed will be at our sole discretion and will not be limited by the previous description(s).

Please do not repeat posts, post comments under another persons name or post comments under multiple names. Any of these may cause you to be banned from future posts.

A valid email address is required to post comments, they will not be publicly displayed, published, shared or sold to a third party. Your email address may be used by the moderator to contact you privately.

Please avoid offensive, crude or innapropriate words, terms and descriptions in your comments, this blog intends to be family friendly.

Please do not post comments that detract from the general theme of the blog post and other comments, these can disrupt the "flow" of discussion and may not be approved.

The individual or organization authoring a given blog post may or may not be available to respond to your comments.
The moderator may or may not forward comments to the blog author.
The blog Author may add a response to the blog comments, reply to comments by email or may not be available to respond at all.
Please do not be offended if there is no response to a blog comment, all posted comments should add to the general discussion and not focus on personal questions. Personal questions should be directed to the blog author or you may use our contact form to contact the moderator directly.

Any and all comments posted to this blog are the sole responsibility of the person posting the comments. The blog owner, moderator, author or administrator are responsible for their own posts and comments and cannot be held liable for others comments.

When submitting a comment on this blog, you agree that any comments and content is your own, and to hold this site, and any representatives harmless from any and all repercussions, damages, or liability.

Please refrain from posting personal or private information such as your email, real address, phone number etc., this type of information may be removed from a comment or the comment may not be approved for display. For your protection, never share this type of information in  a comment.

If you feel copyrighted material has been used in a comment or blog post on this blog please use our contact form to notify us and we will  review the information then respond by removing the material in question, responding in a timely fashion or both. We respect the rights of others and will not knowingly display material copyrighted by others.

All blog posts are Copyright of this site or the respective Authors.
Copyright © 2012- 2015  PPP Design  All rights reserved.

Comment:Email address will not be displayed
Website:  Format:http;//www.sitename.com
*Enter Verification Code: 18539

* Required
All comments will be reviewed before being displayed. See the comment policy on the right side panel.